An incident was brought on his behalf against him and other issues that were in violation of his Constitutional rights because he was jailed for so long with no charges filed. The evening before his case was to be heard because of the Supreme Court charges were finally filed against him. It really is believed that this is only done so that the Supreme Court would not hear the full case due to the fact Bush Administration might have been found guilty of wrongdoing. Ironically, no charges were filed which had to accomplish using the allegations of his supposed involvement to detonate a “dirty bomb.” He was charged with lesser and less specific crimes though Attorney General Ashcroft had stated as he was detained that the data against Padilla was overwhelming. Before he had been set to stand trial, Padilla’s attorney tried to argue that due to the torture he was subjected to additionally the length of time he was detained he had been not mentally competent to face trial. A judge ruled which he was competent in which he was eventually found guilty and sentenced to 17 years in prison (Martinez, 2007).
On Monday April 4th, 2011 the House of Representatives reviewed the Patriot Act and voted to extend it towards the 8th of December, giving the energy towards the Federal Bureau of Investigation and several other federal agencies to still use roving wiretaps among other powers that overstep our constitutional rights. February 28th, 2011 was considered to be the last day of the Patriot Act since no new legislation had been passed. With this specific extension, America waits for hearings to be held because of the Judiciary Committee. It and Democrats argued against the extension when it came down to voting for the extension many Republicans voted for. However, that which was a surprise to many was the known undeniable fact that sixty-five Democrats voted when it comes to extension of the Patriot Act. One out of particular, Democratic Representative C. A. Dutch Ruppersberger from Maryland, the highest democrat that is ranking the Intelligence Committee, want to see this extension all of the way through to 2013. Many of the 27 Republicans who voted contrary to the extension, such as for instance Dana Rohrabacher, believe the American individuals will face a legitimate danger of out-of-control prosecutions plus the possibility for out-of-control spy networks effect that is taking.
Groups like the privacy that is electronic Center (EPIC) and also the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) are fighting for reform regarding the Patriot Act. The ACLU believes that law enforcement agencies will require advantageous asset of the balance and use of this power to trouble innocent members of the Muslim-American communities. On March 30th, 2011, the ACLU appeared prior to the House subcommittee from the dependence on reform for the Patriot Act, arguing that the Government tabs on communications without any proof is a violation associated with the American peoples’ basic Amendment rights. Senator Patrick Leahy felt because it did nothing to uphold the government’s accountability that he would not support the extension. EPIC used the Freedom of Information Act (FOIP) to get reports on intelligence law violations through the Intelligence Oversight Board. EPIC has spoken on one or more occasion to your Senate Judiciary Committee to require the Attorney General to are accountable to Congress any unlawful investigations under the Patriot Act, yet this battle still continues today.
The lives of both US citizens and immigrant are affected by the power for the Patriot Act.
For example, foreigners who seek education through grants, non-citizens trying to gain residency that is permanent citizenship, visas and work permits in the usa are being scrutinized beneath the new requirement system for the Patriot Act. One quite high ranking official in america Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) made it clear then they will receive disapproval if there are any doubts regarding an applicant’s eligibility. More government that is stringent and thorough background checks are just another obstacle developed by the Patriot Act. These rules that are new the Patriot Act also not in favor of all of the checks and balances from the Bill of Rights that has been put into location to protect citizens’ privacy. At that time, misuse of surveillance powers by law enforcement agencies were uncovered, like the 1974 revelation that the FBI and foreign intelligence agencies had spied on over 10,000 U.S. citizens, including Martin Luther King Jr. Today, citizens utilizing the internet within the privacy of their home feel a discomfort with what they are doing because their actions are susceptible to review in the event that government suspects they’ve been participating in anything terrorist related. For online users, it opens the door for widespread surveillance of web surfing, e-mails and peer-to-peer systems. Also place in the midst of the arguments are companies and libraries that are public need certainly to turn over any potentially incriminating documents accessed through their systems, at the request of federal police force agencies, without giving any notification for their customers.
I believe that particular facets of the Patriot Act are feasible, but just with intensive oversight not only from Congress, but additionally from the Supreme Court. Congress can may play a role by making certain the laws they pass try not to go against the protections promised to Americans in the First, Fourth, Fifth, Ninth, and Fourteenth Amendments regarding the Constitution. The Supreme Court could continue steadily to review cases to ensure that the Constitution is upheld even if it comes to cases that deal with suspected terrorists that are American citizens. Our laws are making this country what it is today but it is feared that money maybe the downfall of your nation. The freedom of life, property and liberty has converted into greed. Terrorist acts up against the US terrify many Americans, however in many cases, money and power scares them more. The people vote to own government representation but the people must be more involved with the decision making process. As americans to make sure that those people do not remain in office if you elect someone to office and they do not do the job correctly, it is up to us. That will only be done if people get more mixed up in political process and not only be happy with how are you affected.
The expression “land of this free” can be used too generously. The way it is currently, the Patriot Act goes against everything that this country is short for and deprives us all of write my paper your civil liberties. Some argue you cannot give limitless power to a few and expect things to turn out well that it is necessary to maintain order, but. If the Patriot Act is to be kept as law, the folks it accountable who overstep or abuse the power given to them that we elect to the House of Representatives (House) and Senate need to hold the people who use. Also, the president should not be the deciding element in deeming an individual a “threat” or “enemy combatant” when giving an individual such a title strips them of basic human rights. They are occupying, it should be unacceptable for authorities to use tactics that are considered torture when trying to elicit information from an individual, whether that person be an American citizen or not if it is unacceptable for soldiers in war to commit crimes against the people of the nation.
A brief history regarding the Patriot Act actually goes back towards the eighteenth century under different laws put in place during war time and energy to protect the usa.
The protection of our nation may be the highest together with most important responsibility of our government. The laws created are meant to be when you look at the best interest of the citizens. Most likely, the citizens give the government the power to look after their welfare and also to protect them. Individuals with this degree of power sometimes pay attention to your whole without rational as well as the individual has to pay the fee. There ought to be a limit from the power associated with government, if the way that is nation’s of, liberty and pursuit of property are in jeopardy we must consider the rational the government uses when governing this nation. We can’t as a nation just sit back and accept what exactly is being carried out. So that you can elicit change, we must stand up and do something about it.